|
RULES AND
REGULATIONS COMMITTEE
|
|||
|
|
|||
ITEM III: |
ACTION
ITEMS |
|||
|
||||
B. |
REVIEW PROVISIONS AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. 104, MODIFYING THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL PROCESS |
|||
|
||||
Meeting
Date: |
May 4,
2004 |
Budgeted: N/A |
||
|
||||
Staff
Contact: |
Stephanie
Pintar |
Program/Line
Item No.: N/A |
||
|
|
Cost
Estimate: N/A |
||
|
||||
General
Counsel Approval: N/A |
||||
Committee
Recommendation: The Water Demand
Committee recommends no modifications to the ordinance or processes. |
||||
CEQA
Compliance: N/A |
||||
SUMMARY: The Board will soon be reviewing Ordinance No. 104 (Exhibit B-1), an ordinance modifying the
administrative appeal process for Board members. Although the ordinance contained two review dates, February 2003
and August 2003, review did not take place as scheduled. At this time, the Rules and Regulations
Committee should review the provisions of the ordinance and recommend any
modifications or changes to the Board, as necessary.
Ordinance No. 104 allows Board members to call up appealable subordinate decisions for Board review without paying an appeal fee, and allows a refund of processing fees for appeals when an appeal provides a significant benefit to the public and/or environment. The ordinance also eliminated an outdated reference to benefit assessments. Since its adoption in 2002, no Board appeals of subordinate decisions have been made. A copy of the staff report from the adoption of Ordinance No. 104 is attached as Exhibit B-2.
In
adopting Ordinance No. 104, the Board also adopted a set of Appeal Processing
and Noticing Guidelines (Exhibit B-3). The Guidelines included 13 Implementation
Procedures, including weekly reporting of all appealable decisions, both at the
District office and on the website.
While staff has been able to post the list of appealable decisions
weekly, the process has added additional workload to the Water Demand Division
staff who must log each appealable decision in an Excel worksheet that is
converted to a web document for posting.
The process has also added a record-keeping component for the individual
who posts the information: Records must
be tracked and removed from the list after 21 days. Until the new database is operational, maintaining and posting
information on appealable decisions is a manual process.
RECOMMENDATION: Neither staff nor the Water Demand Committee recommend any changes at this time. The Water Demand Committee reviewed this item on April 13, 2004.
U:\staff\word\committees\RulesRegsReview\20040504\itemIIIB.doc